Is OPT Really Ending in 2026? What the DHS Rule and Policy Threats Actually Mean for F-1 Students

What DHS Has Actually Confirmed

In January 2026, DHS sent a letter — later made public — confirming that it is formally re-evaluating the scope and duration of OPT and STEM OPT and may amend practical training regulations through rulemaking. This is not a rumor. It is an official government confirmation.

The letter points specifically to a Spring Unified Agenda entry under RIN 1653-AA97 — a regulatory identifier that signals a future proposed rule aimed at four stated goals: worker protection, fraud prevention, national security concerns, and stronger SEVP oversight.

"DHS emphasizes that OPT exists only by regulation (8 C.F.R. 214.2(f)(10)), not statute, which means they can change duration, eligibility, reporting, or employer requirements without Congress."

— EIG Law analysis of DHS January 2026 letter, eiglaw.com

What this means in plain English: DHS is not just posturing. They have officially notified the regulatory system that a rule change is coming. The four stated goals reveal the likely shape of any change:

Fraud prevention

Directly tied to the HSI OPT employer fraud investigations currently underway in 8 states. Expect tighter employer verification requirements.

Worker protection

Signals potential changes to wages, working conditions, or the types of employment that qualify — likely targeting the staffing/consulting firm loophole.

National security concerns

Countries flagged as security risks may see stricter eligibility screening or processing for OPT applications.

Stronger SEVP oversight

More rigorous university and employer compliance reporting requirements, potentially including site visits or mandatory E-Verify for all OPT employers.

Why OPT Is Vulnerable: Regulation vs. Law

This is the most important structural fact every F-1 student needs to understand: OPT was not created by Congress. It was created by the Department of Homeland Security (and before it, the former INS) using its administrative regulatory authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Program Type	How It Was Created	How It Can Be Changed	Vulnerability Level
OPT / STEM OPT	DHS regulation (8 C.F.R. § 214.2(f))	DHS rulemaking — no Congressional vote needed	High
H-1B visa	Act of Congress (Immigration Act of 1990)	Requires new legislation — Congressional vote	Lower
F-1 student visa status	Combination of INA statute + DHS regulation	Partial regulatory, partial statutory	Medium

The practical implication: if OPT were codified in federal law by Congress, changing it would require months or years of Congressional debate, hearings, and votes. Because it is a regulation, DHS can begin the change process today with just a regulatory notice — though they still must follow the Administrative Procedure Act, which requires a notice-and-comment period before any final rule.

What Trump's USCIS Nominee Said — and What It Actually Means

According to reporting by Forbes, Joseph Edlow — Trump's nominee to lead USCIS — stated during his confirmation process that he intends to eliminate post-completion employment authorization for F-1 students. This would end OPT as it currently exists.

"Trump says he wants international students to stay and work after graduation. His USCIS nominee says he wants to end the program that lets them do exactly that."

— Forbes analysis, May 2025

There is a real tension here. President Trump has publicly stated that he wants international graduates — especially STEM graduates — to be able to stay and work in the US. At the same time, his immigration policy framework is pushing hard to reduce post-study work authorization. Both things are true simultaneously, and the outcome depends on which faction wins the internal policy debate.

What a nomination means vs. what a rule means: A nominee expressing a position is not the same as a policy change. Before anything actually changes, there must be a formal Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) published in the Federal Register, a public comment period (typically 30–60 days), review of comments, and a final rule — with an effective date usually 60+ days after publication. This entire process takes 12–24+ months under normal circumstances.

What the Courts Have Said: The WashTech Case

OPT has already survived legal challenges. The WashTech litigation — brought by a tech worker union arguing that OPT illegally undercut US worker wages — went all the way to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which upheld the legality of both OPT and STEM OPT, confirming that DHS has the authority to run these programs under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

But here is the nuance that matters: the same legal authority that courts confirmed DHS has to create OPT is the same authority DHS can use to change it. A court victory confirming that DHS can run OPT does not prevent DHS from later choosing to modify or end it through a new rulemaking.

New bills are also moving through Congress — some aimed at restricting OPT further, others aimed at protecting international students and potentially codifying OPT into law. Congressional action to formalize OPT as a statute would significantly increase its long-term stability. That fight is ongoing as of May 2026.

How Long Would It Actually Take to End OPT?

Even in the most aggressive scenario where DHS moves immediately, the regulatory process creates a real timeline buffer:

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) published

Earliest: late 2026, based on current regulatory agenda

Public comment period

Minimum 30 days, typically 60 days — students and employers can submit comments

DHS reviews comments and drafts final rule

3–12+ months depending on complexity and volume of comments

Final rule published in Federal Register

Effective date typically 60+ days after publication

Potential legal challenges in federal court

Injunctions can pause implementation — as happened with DACA and other rules

Bottom line on timing: If you are currently on OPT or STEM OPT, or are about to start, the program almost certainly continues through your current authorization period. The realistic risk horizon for major structural change is 2027 at the earliest — and that assumes no successful legal challenges, which historically have slowed or stopped similar rules.

What Is NOT Changing: The 180-Day STEM OPT Auto-Extension Still Works

In October 2025, DHS issued a rule ending automatic EAD extensions for several visa categories. Many F-1 students panicked, thinking this killed the 180-day automatic employment authorization for STEM OPT applicants.

It did not. According to a December 2025 analysis by immigration law firm Murthy Law, the October 2025 rule explicitly does not affect the 180-day STEM OPT automatic extension for timely filed applications.

Still in effect: 180-day automatic STEM OPT extension

If you file your STEM OPT I-765 before your current OPT EAD expires, you automatically receive up to 180 days of continued employment authorization while USCIS processes your case — regardless of the October 2025 rule.

Critical: you must file on time to get this protection

The 180-day auto-extension only applies if you file before your OPT EAD expiration date. File even one day late, and the auto-extension does not apply. File at least 90 days before your OPT end date to give yourself maximum buffer.

What F-1 Students Should Actually Do Right Now

Panic is not a strategy. Here is a concrete, rational action plan based on the actual risk picture in May 2026:

1. File your OPT or STEM OPT application as early as legally possible

OPT applications can be filed up to 90 days before your program end date. STEM OPT applications can be filed up to 90 days before your OPT EAD expires. Filing early is the single most effective thing you can do.

2. Do not rely on a rule that doesn't exist yet to change your plans

Do not defer job offers, skip OPT applications, or change your degree program based on speculation about a rule that has not been proposed. Make decisions based on what the law actually says today.

3. Stay strictly compliant with all current OPT requirements

Report employer changes within 10 days. Track your unemployment days. Keep your SEVP Portal updated. In a tightened enforcement environment, students with clean records are in a meaningfully stronger position.

4. Follow the Federal Register for the NPRM, not social media

When DHS publishes a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), it will appear in the Federal Register at federalregister.gov. That is the authoritative source. Reddit threads and Instagram posts are not.

5. Submit a public comment when the NPRM is published

Once DHS publishes a proposed rule, there is a formal public comment period. International students, universities, and employers can and should submit comments. Historically, high comment volume has influenced the final shape of rules — and even delayed implementation.

6. Build a backup plan without abandoning your current plan

Know what your options are if OPT is shortened or restricted: H-1B sponsorship timeline, countries with post-study work options, or advanced degree programs. Having a Plan B does not mean executing it prematurely.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is OPT being eliminated in 2026?

Not yet. As of May 2026, OPT and STEM OPT are still active programs. DHS has confirmed it is formally re-evaluating the programs and a proposed rule (RIN 1653-AA97) is listed in the regulatory agenda. However, no rule has been finalized. Any change would require a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, a public comment period, and a final rule — a process that typically takes 12–24+ months.

Why can DHS eliminate OPT without Congress?

Because OPT is created by regulation (8 C.F.R. § 214.2(f)(10)), not by a law passed by Congress. DHS created OPT through its regulatory authority and can therefore modify or eliminate it through the same rulemaking process — without a Congressional vote. This is why the program is more vulnerable than if it were codified in statute.

What did Joseph Edlow (Trump's USCIS nominee) say about OPT?

According to reporting by Forbes, Joseph Edlow — Trump's nominee for USCIS director — stated that he intends to eliminate post-completion employment authorization for F-1 students, which would effectively end OPT as it currently exists. However, a nomination is not a policy change. Any actual elimination would still require the full rulemaking process.

Did courts ever rule on whether OPT is legal?

Yes. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the legality of OPT and STEM OPT in the WashTech litigation, confirming that DHS has the authority to run these programs under the Immigration and Nationality Act. However, the same legal framework that lets DHS create OPT also lets DHS change it — so a court victory in defense of the program's existence does not prevent future regulatory changes.

What should F-1 students do right now given the uncertainty?

File OPT applications as early as possible (up to 90 days before program end date). For STEM OPT, file your I-765 extension at least 90 days before your OPT expiry to secure the 180-day automatic extension. Maintain perfect compliance — any OPT fraud investigation finding or unemployment violation makes your situation significantly worse if policy changes hit. Stay current with official DHS and USCIS announcements, not social media rumors.

Does the October 2025 EAD rule affect the 180-day STEM OPT auto-extension?

No. According to a December 2025 analysis by Murthy Law Firm, the October 2025 DHS rule ending automatic EAD extensions for certain visa categories does NOT affect the 180-day automatic employment authorization for timely filed STEM OPT extensions. F-1 students who file their STEM OPT extension on time before their OPT EAD expires still receive up to 180 days of automatic work authorization.

Is OPT Really Ending in 2026? What the DHS Review and Policy Threats Actually Mean for F-1 Students

Why This Matters Right Now

In This Guide